Monthly Archive for March, 2011

What Scientists Want: Robert Boyle’s To-Do List

From Felicity Henderson, The Royal Society

Have you ever wished you could swim underwater for extended periods without scuba-gear? Wanted to be taller? Wished you could put a halt to the ageing process? As it happens, you’re not alone. Over three hundred years ago, Robert Boyle FRS wrote a list of things that he hoped could be achieved through science. Beginning with ‘The Prolongation of Life’, the list includes items such as ‘emulating fish … by custom and education only’, ‘attaining gigantick dimensions’, and ‘recovery of youth, or at least the signs of it’.

For me, the fascinating thing about the list is its eclectic mixture of topics for research. Today most of us would consider the prolongation of life as a worthy cause (although this may not necessarily have been so in the deeply religious culture of Boyle’s time); we would perhaps be more dubious about the usefulness of teaching people how to swim underwater like fish. I’d definitely like to see ‘A perpetuall light’ discovered in my lifetime, but ‘Varnishes perfumable by rubbing’? Um, not something I’d ever really thought about. But that’s the other thing I love about this list – the way it shows the curiosity of the early Fellows of the Royal Society about every aspect of life. They were just beginning to realise that it was possible to know more about how the world works, and Boyle’s list shows how eager they were to make discoveries that would change the lives of ordinary people for the better.

To Read More…

Mr. Bryan’s Address to the Jury in the Scopes’ Case

From eSkeptic,

May it please the court, and gentlemen of the jury: Demosthenes, the greatest of ancient orators, in his “oration on the crown,” the most famous of his speeches, began by supplicating the favor of all the gods and goddesses of Greece. If, in a case which involved only his own fame and fate, he felt justified in petitioning the heathen gods of his country, surely we, who deal with the momentous issues involved in this case, may well pray to the ruler of the universe for wisdom to guide us in the performance of our several parts in this historic trial.

Let me in the first place, congratulate our cause that circumstances have committed the trial to a community like this and entrusted the decision to a jury made up largely of the yeomanry of the state. The book in issue in this trial contains on its first page two pictures contrasting the disturbing noises of a great city with the calm serenity of the country. It is a tribute that rural life has fully earned.

I appreciate the sturdy honesty and independence of these who come into daily contact with the earth, who living near to nature, worship nature’s god and who, dealing with the myriad mysteries of earth and air, seek to learn from revelation about the Bible’s wonder working God. I admire the stern virtues, the vigilance and the patriotism of the class from which the jury is drawn, and am reminded of the lines of Scotland’s immortal bard, which, when changed but slightly, describe your country’s confidence in you:

To Read More…

Scientific Regress: When Science Goes Backward

From John Horgan, Scientific American

To celebrate the ends of years, decades and other milestones, science publications often churn out “Whither science?” predictions. Just last week, The New York Times Science Times section celebrated its, um, 32nd birthday with a special issue on “What’s next in science”. What I found fascinating was the issue’s overall tone of caution rather than the traditional boosterish enthusiasm.

Gina Kolata recalled a job interview 25 years ago with U.S. News and World Report, an editor of which asked her, “What will be important medical news next year?” Kolata replied that “next year gene therapy will be shown to work.” Gene therapy, of course, has been a big bust. Kolata goes on to say that the best answer to “Whither science?” is to expect the unexpected. (Fortunately for her, Kolata didn’t get the job with what a mean friend of mine liked to call “U.S. Snooze and World Distort,” the print version of which just died after years of terminal illness.)

To Read More…

Men With Nets Meet Scientists With Clipboards

From Lekelia D. Jenkins in the New York Times blog “Scientist at Work”:

The past couple of days have felt a bit like a stage in the show “The Amazing Race.” We were on a mission to collect specific information in a set period of time and were willing to go to extremes to get it. We got wet, dirty and hot, and tried traditional foods that might give some people pause. We unexpectedly rented a boat and had confusing conversations with the captain about our destination, and yes, there was even a television camera involved. But I should start at the beginning…

Last Thursday was a hectic day. It started with reporters from Ecuadorean television and print news interviewing Patrick Christie, the project co-leader, in Spanish about what we are doing. After that, things just picked up steam. If not for our casual dress, passers-by might have mistaken us for lawyers prepping for a trial.

In a way, they would have been right: Rather than preparing for a trial in a courtroom, we were gearing up for different sort of trial known as a field test.

Environmental science meets cross-cultural social science to obtain quality data on the impact of fishing practices.

For more…